Just another site


leave a comment »

The Federal Election Commission FEC

We Independents stand out from partisans in several important ways to enhance America’s democratic values and individual freedom.

We are political activists, environmentalists, advocates for social justice and human rights activists Perhaps regular citizens .

Our library meeting were held out of State because of fear of losing freedom. We have to say that the political sphere, even at the lowest level, is designed only for those who reap the benefits of being part of Republicans and Democrats families.

When people like us choose to get involved and create political party to struggle with our own money, knowledge and risk of losing everything from business to life even family. A small group of people will ignite fire on social media about your skin color, faith and culture to discourage individuals, independents and political activist. In my case many thought that Mehdi is an India American and named my little store ” the Ghandi Marts” .

These small groups are in town by town and city by city to support special interest for the major political parties and pre-selected individuals for the positions the elections are to be held such as in the State of Connecticut.

The local authorities and the members of the special interest group at the first opportunity will find certain violation of fire, zoning, food, health, building , tax department even walking for petition drive violation to control independents .Thus, hit with the fines , tickets, bills for breaking the laws they barely understood or even knew existed before 2012 election in our case.

How could a minor political party be able survive and organize petition drive, funding contributions, and inform citizens about the truth of Guantanamo Bay Detention center , the Iraq war, Obama Vs.Trump confusion and failure of domestic and foreign policies to vote for the independents or for minor political parties to enhance democracy in the United States of 🇺🇸.

The Federal Election Commission should serve as an important arbiter to encourage minorities to participate in civic duty by getting them involve in the elections for knowledge not for tbe greed , the special interest groups town by town and the city by city shell pick individuals selected by the God because of knowledge otherwise in God we don’t trust.

The Supreme Court of the United States of America needs to explain the first. Amendment of the Constitution to the major political powers and the special Interest groups to behave according to the Constitution.

The laws are to encourage people not to fear from pre-existing parties and individuals who are privileged and have enough power to create conditions that can force individual and minorities out of state, businesses, Job opportunities and families could go as far as making you not to use technology, the new generation of diverse Americans wants to see change the Elections Enforcement Commission should encourage the young generation to join the democratic process, the pre-existing parties have too much power and that sometimes can be abused upon. Any small business man would usually never take a risk like we did and end up losing business, source of income, and Job opportunities, however we would not give up ringing the bell for freedom and justice the way Jesus the Christ did.

God Bless America
Mehdi LLC
The People Party of Connecticut

Written by humanfealty/human Faith

October 28, 2022 at 6:37 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Fundamental of life

leave a comment »


This Book explains the belief that there is only one energy which is responsible of division of particles into two opposing aspects and makes up the 12 basic particles in order to create the universe and its nature , the way its behaves. Dualism of Good and Bad, day and night, navigate and positive give in and intakes of Sun energy. The philosophy behind mono saves our planet based on the environmental crisis.

Written by humanfealty/human Faith

April 19, 2022 at 6:27 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Secrets of Democracy

leave a comment »

There are a variety of different democratic systems throughout the world by observing British colonialism, American Jefferson system, Switzerland democratic system and Indian constitutional system. In this note, I compare different laws of democracy. The theory and practice of freedom comes from a variety of systems such as democracy, Republic, constitution, state, kingdom.

Laws of Nature gives us only a tiny taste of a huge universe , In simple words honeybees, ants and many other creatures are giving us an excellent example of society, system, rules and democracy through natural law, nature is our home and pure democracy by understanding that we are just tiny matter in a huge loop of life. Some creatures are well organized according to the law of nature and certain basic rules are mutated in them to survive together. The proposal of our man made democracy is to have a basic knowledge of civic duties and certain rules written or memorized by the people to live in peace. The rules have many names such as the contracts, the charters, the constitution, the documents of laws, treaties that last two hundred years. We are very familiar with the term constitution, which is commonly used nowadays.

Almost every state must have some kind of constitution written or unwritten even in a state ruled by a dictator there is a constitution to direct people. Any state that does not have a constitution would be considered a regime of anarchy but with some kind of order. A constitution is the body of rules that determine how government operation is to be carried out on a daily basis. It includes all rules as to kings or presidents, legislators, senators, ministers, judges, election and so on. According to the translation from the Book of Rabi, the first human government that emerged on earth was an autocracy or plutocracy by a man called King Nimrod. Before Nimrod, there was no need for government in the Garden of Eden. Adam and Eve obeyed God, so there was no conflict. Sin had not yet entered, so there was no theft or violence. First Kosher food was fish and the first early morning prayer started from Adam .Perhaps the population grew and Nimrod declared himself Supreme power and challenged the Efficient cause (Lord) to introduce Human rights. 

Aristocracy with theocracy a system of government by nobility started with Prophet Abraham who introduced family government for his extended family as well as others who lived in this village. This included providing work and income. He introduced a system and obligation to defend his people if they were attacked when a member of this democracy was captured. Prophet Ibrahim organized his army and rescued citizens in this first organized system. Prophet Abraham is the reason noontime prayer started and the system of sacrificing animals and birds took roots for Halal food .

Sumer, located in Mesopotamia, which is Iraq, now started complex civilization in an interregnum of over 70 years as gerontocracy developing the first city and system of states. It was in these cities that the earliest known form of writing, cuneiform script, appeared from Hammurabi for basic direction, names of authorities, streets , cities names and a proper system of first human language . Many systems were introduced by hagiocracy. A system of government by King or High Priest changed hierarchy to kakistocracy to barbarian way of life continued and came revolutionary change with Prophet Moses the ten commandments and afternoon prayer was introduced and the day of Sutran was declared a day of rest and prayer new system introduced according to the book of laws and referendums. Thirteen tribes continued the best system of Government by the nobility of gerontocracy and referendum until King David passed that turned into kakistocracy. King David introduced the evening prayer when the lord accepted his apology after seven days and nights he locked himself from embarrassment for committing the sin with Beth Shiba and married her the second child Salomon was a gift from the almighty lord. 

Over time many new nations started to realize that they needed a system of Government, usually oligarchy and theocracy ruled for a long time until stratocracy started gaining power and bureaucracy for democracy started from the British and continued for the last three centuries. The British have the oldest living constitution in the world, which has made the circle of the globe and become the common possession of civilized people due to colonialism. The British system of government has spread far and wide because of a the monotheistic idea which was extremely important to enhance knowledge worldwide to improve life and higher power used the British to enhance the system of government although some may argue that they took treasuries of many nations. Overtime British slowly developed through the centuries, got away from the constitution, and developed an amalgam of institutions, principles and practices. The constitution is a composite of charters and statues of judicial decisions of common law, of precedents, wages and traditions. It is not like the American and Indian style derived from a specific source of writing constitution or Amendment but from several past examples and experience open to a process of growth. It is a child of wisdom and of chance whose course has sometimes been guided by accident and sometimes by high design of Almighty (Rab) for human Development.

In the 21st century, the future of democracy lies in the conscious art of freedom in which each successive generation has the right to add its own amendments without any concern of old symmetry of the forefathers and its structure because change is part of life. The journey from constitution to common sense takes hundreds of years to become the fruit of intellectual people, a process of gradual change otherwise it’s just ink on the papers for distraction and arguments but justice.

In 2012, I visited London to see my Great Grandfather sword in the British Museum and tried to buy a copy of the British Constitution. the Englishman concept of society and rules are different from many people that I can get a copy of Magna Chart-a of 1215 , the Bill of Rights 1689 , Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 and thousands of similar documents but the whole constitution in one documentary because a substantial portion of the Constitution is based on common sense.

The British do not have in the written form such as freedom is the birthright of all living things does not have to be in writing in a certain way to restrict freedom. This idea inspired me and embraced my limited understanding , that basic rules of a city, state and federal government are written to operate for the function of a government but rules of life should be based on “ liberty “ and cannot be bound into a time capsule .

Human development cannot be restricted by a contract or a constitution because conditions keep changing along with new problems, new technology and knowledge. Thus, the rules that we obey in America are written in black on white paper and constantly getting amendment on top of the amendment, a huge documentary of stone age.

My brain kept asking me the same question, if the British does not have a constitution the idea of theory and practice does not work. , while I was sitting in the train from London to Manchester, asked the English Gentleman who seemed to be well educated about the question of the constitution Mr. John Cromwell replied that the British Constitution is a Parliamentary indeed it is written and keep changing for thousands of years we just do not amend it to save energy and time. The answer cleared my confusion that the British have a constitution.

The five hours journey went by quickly with Mr. John Cromwell who works as an advertising salesperson for a London based newspaper. Our conversation continued for an hour until dinner arrived. Mr. Cromwell is a soft spoken very polite person whose personal idea of constitution is simple and similar to the young Americans that it should be limited to the basic rules to run government not the daily life the word he commonly used in his conversation was “flexibility “of laws.

The beauty of the British Parliamentary system is that the law of 1911 and 1949 allows members of Parliament to bend the House of Lords and House of Common to adopt change in civil and criminal matters to make life easy based on no law more fundamental than individual liberty and freedom. Unfortunately it is the opposite in America after any crisis or at the time of stress things get more complicated in the Houses and the Senate usually new law on top of the old one complicates justice.

Perhaps if I remember the British petition of right and the bill of rights and comparing them between king John Lockland and Queen Isabella’s response at the time of stress and crisis. King John was a very intelligent man who set the foundation of British law the first time certain basic rights were recognized for the common people in the year 1215 and here we are in America after almost 1000 years from the British bill of rights arguing the Patriot Act of 2001 is unconstitutional.

It was interesting to understand that in British history meetings held by the kings with philosophers, poets and intellectual intellectuals to improve laws and conditions of the citizens afterward meeting were turned into conventions just for the argument of the issue to study of theory and practice Perhaps cause and effect. The cause was conventions and effect laws of the constitution. Over time a system was developed.

(b) The conventions of the constitution.

(a) The law of the constitution.

The distinction between the two does not lie in the written nature of the first and the unwritten character of the second; the real beauty of the unwritten part of the constitution is that its power vested on the judicial court of the country to recognize and enforce only the constitution the convention part is not recognized.

In simple words people wish for the constitution with flexibility. It is unitary and parliamentary for the Rule of law, which is the most important principle of liberty. The British do have many statutes or acts of parliament passed from time to time and deal significantly with the constitution matters the most popular ones are the act of Habeas Corpus of 1679. The settlement act of 1701 , the reform acts of 1832, 1867, 1884, 1918, 1928 perhaps some are executive bills by the Crown to override laws to maintain justice and power. The modern politicians are pushing the Great Reform Act to enhance democracy and now are watching the British Parliament in stress condition with the Brexit debate that has reached a new and dizzying level of bizarreness by new lawmakers.

The British Judiciary plays an important charter by interpreting constitution, statutes, common laws and agreements. Common law is another important source of the constitution, the original law of the land, which represented sovereignty of King and Queen although time has changed but the majority of the British constitution was based on common law. The reason I picked British constitution and law to compare with other democracies around the globe just because British have one of the oldest and most advanced systems of government Perhaps the reason of advancement is that the Queen and the people do not have much faith in abstracted theories, they are naturalists and realists for liberties . British Leadership believes in the trial and error method and is open to debates and arguments when making a law in the form of convention that allows plenty of time for experiment if the experience suggests that a certain convention needs to be modified its easily changed and embodied in a statute afterward.

The British are very bright because they are willing to change with the time and much credit goes to the parliamentary process, the Queen, the Prime Minister, House of Common, House of Lords perhaps the public wishes is a democracy which takes a long time to produce fruit of knowledge.

Two major political parties have always been in the United Kingdom and the United States in one form or the other with different names. Before the war of Independence in America, there were the Loyalists and the Patriots. The Loyalists were loyal to the British crown, became property owners, and later worked for independence with the Patriots. After the independence of the United States of America, the old ideology disappeared and two new parties emerged. The Federalist and the anti-federalist. Those who supported a strong central government called themselves Federalist “ the Republican Party “ and those who supported the strong state government called themselves Anti-Federalist which are the Democratic Party .

Therefore, to-day November 11 2019 in the United States there are only two privileged parties. There are other small ideologies but unfortunately in the violations of either Federal or the State Elections Enforcement Commission. The people’s party of Connecticut is also in violation of an unknown law, which controls party member’s financial condition and movements. Therefore, my struggle will continue to enhance and upgrade the system of justice and freedom.

Grappling with the scope of the constitutions, charters and laws of many nations, Switzerland laws are interesting to grapple with. Switzerland is the heart of Europe. Its constitution deserves special study because it is the brain of democracy because no other nation on earth has as many democratic institutions as Switzerland. In spite of diversities of religion, language, culture Swiss are a United in regards to democratic values and freedom. This shows that differences of religion, color, culture, language cannot prevent people leading a peaceful and harmonious life. This is the only country that has established a system of Plural executive. This implies that in Switzerland the executive power is not concentrated in the hands of one individual like in many nations. A plural or collegiate executive is a Nobel feature of the Switzerland Constitution that inspired me the most. Let me explain in detail how the Swiss constitution works. It is a written documentary.

Switzerland is governed according to the fundamental law of 1848 and first revision was done in 1874, it is bigger than the American constitution because many parts of the constitution deal with non- constitutional matters such as fishing, hunting, and control of conditions, which are general nature matters. Switzerland’s constitution is also a rigged one like America’s and not easy to amend by an easy process Perhaps better than many nations because it’s based on a referendum from the people themselves and referendum is done when the majority of people agree as well as by the legislature when an issue arises. Switzerland has eight political parties: the President and the Vice President are elected for a term of one year.

The Swiss constitution is like the American constitution in character based on federal language and only nation in the world possesses a system of Plural executive. The federal Council (the CEOs) not one but seven CEOs who are elected by the federal legislature for a term of four years with supreme executive power.

Switzerland’s government system does not have the Prime Minister but the President of the council with almost equal power of CEOs. The beauty is the President who is elected for one year by the federal legislature. The council can introduce Bills in the legislature Perhaps members of the federal council cannot vote in the legislature to keep the balance. The council is responsible to the legislature and it cannot resign when its policies and actions are rejected by the legislature therefore combination of responsibility and permanence makes the executive efficient and stable system of democracy.

Switzerland constitution supports initiative, referendum, and I believe this makes Switzerland standout for the people by the people for freedom. Initiative enables people to place on the statute the law book as they desire the law should. Perhaps a referendum enables them to reject those laws, which are old, detrimental to their interests. Referendum is a shield with which the people cut off undesirable legislation and initiative is a sword with which the people cut the way for the enactment of their own ideas into laws.

Since I lived in many countries to observe the voting process and present conditions for human fealty. I believe the future of humanity lies in the system that gives power to truth and justice. In advanced civilizations, knowledge and technology are the future to vote from their cell phone, computer, home television to control absentee ballot frauds. Every citizen should be part of every bill that goes through from municipality’s level to all the way to the House of Senate and the Parliament just by clicking on the yea or nay by referendum.

Someone may wonder why the Swiss constitution is better than many nations just because its power vested to the people and two important elements are the referendum and the initiative are extremely intelligent elements for a republic and a democracy.

The Swiss constitution does not have any diplomatic bill of rights like one in British, American, Russian, japan and Pakistan. Perhaps a constitution that doesn’t mean people are not free they enjoy more freedom because the constitution guarantees referendums and initiative, the two edged sword that provides equality before the law , freedom of the press , freedom of association and freedom of the opinion it’s government by the people not government for the people.

Switzerland constitution Article 49 guarantees them freedom of conscience and religion and under Article 56, they are giving; the freedom to form associations and intelligence that the four languages are legally used in the matter of legal government documents German, French, Italian and English.

In the United States Supreme Court, justices are the guardian angels of the constitution who barely follow through the English if not spelled clearly in the constitution. I was arguing with five judges in the CHRO case Docket NO. HHB-CV-11-5015298S on June 23 2011 that the 2nd Amendment needs to be upgraded to safe lives according to the time Justices did not agree.

Switzerland Federal Tribunal is the highest court in Switzerland. It cannot declare a Federal law unconstitutional that makes life easy and saves lives in the matter of conflict. People amend law by referendum and it changes the old law as needed, however the federal tribunal can declare a cantonal law unconstitutional unless it clashes with any federal law.

Switzerland constitution has special features for its plural executive, which is a different blend of the Indian, American, Russian, Italian, German, Brazilian and British system Perhaps democracy is the pillar of humanity in the Switzerland constitution.

Republicanism is showing in the lawmaking process by caring of diversities and languages on the international level despite the size of the Confederation “and sometimes “federation “to me it’s an advanced democracy. The Swiss constitution clearly imposed a number of restrictions on both Center Government and Cantons especially on the matter of Individual freedom. Switzerland is like an American style Republic with an easy system of revision and amendment of constitution with referendum. Switzerland federal system is like the American style and system.

Switzerland’s federal system contains two lists of power: the federal list and the concurrent list. Here we do not have concurrent power according to the United States constitution. The power of democracy is vested on the seven CEOs to control abuse of power is an excellent ideology and the federal council is elected by the federal assembly for a term of four years. All members have to disclose business interests as well as all assists before and after from either chamber to control political corruption.

The constitution clearly indicates that not more than one member of the federal council is chosen from the same canton and must be from different political idealism to represent the true spirit of democracy. The seven members can rotate to become the President or the Vice President only for one year with referendum and the President power is equal to seven members, which makes executive power neither the Presidential or Parliamentary. Switzerland judiciary is the guardian of the constitution and decides all disputes and the federal assembly elects judges for six-year terms.

In our country, the Supreme Court appoints the President with the consent appoints nine judges for life while average developed democracies have fourth and more judges. Perhaps Switzerland has an excellent system of government, which represents many different languages, religions and political ideologies without major conflicts.

Therefore, now highlight India’s “Bharat “system of government. India is a democratic republic. The present constitution of India was framed by the constitution assembly which was established in accordance with the Cabinet Mission Plan, the same ideology that we have in America constituents assembly. In fact the American model is used in many nations using representatives of the people much credit goes to the British Crown in fact Indians were not given the right to frame their own destination in 1874 to 1935 the British Parliament passed many Acts to regulate the government of India. In 1938 Gentleman named Mr. Jawaharlal Lal clearly wrote that the national congress stands for independence and a democratic state and constitution of free India must be without outside interference based on democratic way and there is no other way.

The constituent assembly set up under the provisions of the cabinet mission plan consisted of 385 members in which 292 from British India and 93 from the Bharat. The assembly met on December 9th1946 the members of Muslim League did not attend its meeting they asked for two separate constituent assemblies one for India and other for Pakistan. My great grandfather and grandfather were active member’s part of Muslim League Thus, happened to be a Shia Naqvi and Pakistani doesn’t like ethnic minorities . The constituent assembly was not able to make any progress in the making of constitution in the meantime situation in India got bad to worse. The Congress was compelled to accept the partition of India in accordance with Lord Mount Batten plan submitted on July 11th. On 14 August 1947, Pakistan became independent and on 15 August 1947, India became independent and the constituent assembly became a sovereign body of 300 members.

Dr. Rajendra Prasad was the President of the assembly and a drafting committee under Dr. Ambedkar was ready to submit its draft in February 1948 the draft consisted of 315 articles along with 13 schedules and became the constitution on November 26th 1949. Some provisions of the constitution did get immediate authority. The rest was operational on January 26 1950. The first amendment act passed in 1951 the second in 1952 the third in 1954 and continues as of today November 11, 2019. It is the biggest constituent in the world. In order to understand India’s constitution one must study Judicial interpretations. In the constitution most of the power vested in the executive branch of the president. In constitution expression, “Hindus” meant to cover persons professing Sikh, Jain and Buddhist religion.

India is a Republic because in the constitution it does not recognize any King or Queen as her head. The people elect the president for a period of five years. India is a democratic nation because the people have the right to appoint control or dismiss a Government. Sovereignty belongs to the people of India. India no longer owes allegiance to the British Monarchy, though according to my understanding India is still a member of the commonwealth. A significant feature of the Indian constitution is the provision concerning fundamental rights; these rights are the very essence of a democratic form of government. They called fundamental rights because without them an individual cannot attain his full moral and spiritual stature. The fundamental rights of the Indian citizens are under seven categories. Right to equality , right to freedom, right to freedom of religion, right to property, right against exploitation, cultural and educational rights, and right to constitutional remedies.

Besides the fundamental rights of Indian citizens, the directive principles are by the Sovereign constituent assembly for the guidance of governmental authorities. It is a huge documentary. It is essentially federal in structure and has all the basic features of a federation. Power distributed between the central and the states and Supreme Court, which acts as the interpreter and guardian of the constitution. The Indian Constitution, the eighth schedule includes the recognition of 22 languages and fundamental rights guaranteed by Article 25-28 of the Constitution of India. Every citizen of India has a right to practice and promote his or her religion peacefully. Indian constitution it is “Bhāratīya Saṃvidhāna “. At this present there are constitution contains, 448 articles in 25 parts, 12 schedules, 5 appendices and 98 amendments. India takes place within the framework of its constitution. a federal parliamentary democratic republic in which the President of India is the head of state and the Prime Minister of India is the head of government called “ Lok Sabha “ India is the world’s largest democracy on the planet .

Well, I am an Uneducated American with a mission to make America the world’s best democracy to enhance justice, freedom and knowledge which is only possible with change. Human development is possible only by fair representation of minorities, individual right to vote, diversity of cultures, colors, political and religious freedom and Justice.

“ Stability and financial growth of a democracy depends on wise leadership , population control , poverty control by creating more States or Districts to up-left services and free basic education to secure the future. ” Mehdi

Written By Mehdi

Mehdi LLC

The People’s Party of Connecticut 2012

Written by humanfealty/human Faith

January 28, 2022 at 7:14 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

%d bloggers like this: